The Baker Report - Fictional Best Seller Based on True Events

The fact that the "Baker Report" has become aany outside nations, and is not motivated by them. It
best-seller reflects how trapped the American peopledoesn't really matter whether Syria or Iran are
feel by the current Iraqi nightmare and how franticallyinterested in fermenting unrest or prefer seeing it
search for anything that seems to offer a coherentreduced. Whatever influence they do have, still won't
way out. Unfortunately, however, the report has beenfundamentally alter the final outcome of events.
classified in the non-fiction, rather than fiction section ofThe only perspective for Iraq now, and the only central
the bookshop. Despite some refreshingly honestquestion deliberately ignored by the Baker Report, is
comments about the general state of affairs in Iraq,the break up Iraq into three separate states. Its
the proposals it comes up with are pure fantasy. Itsomission from the report is quite incredible. Even if they
power of effect is largely derived from the veracity ofdon't think it likely, nobody can ignore the fact that it is
a few descriptions of the state of affairs in Iraq, whenvery real possibility, with huge consequences for Iraq,
set against years of lies, distortion and deception fromthe US, the region and the world as a whole. To simply
the White House. In terms of really offering a way outignore it, because they won't entertain the idea, don't
it, its about as useful as using a map of Beijing to getwant it to happen, or don't fancy dealing with it, is
around Baghdad. Its findings amount to little more thanastounding. Arguably, it is not just stupidity to omit it, but
finely worded contradictions intended to hide the trutha dereliction of duty from such supposedly, high
that there is no honourable retreat. Its keyservants of the American state who are entrusted
recommendations are unworkable. The report itselfwith the responsibility of delivering such an important
admits that events there may have "alreadyreport.
overtaken" its findings. But, in truth, they never cameIndeed all the report really says is what everyone
within sight of reading its number plates.knows. That the situation is "grave and deteriorating".
The key military proposal involves empowering theThe Report acknowledges that " A slide toward
Iraqi Army by installing some 20,000 US army trainerschaos could trigger the collapse of the Iraqi
inside Iraqi units during combat missions. However, thisgovernment and a humanitarian catastrophe.
idea immediately shrivelled up like a piece of lightedNeighbouring countries could intervene. Sunni-Shia
cigarette paper in an ashtray, when an Iraqiclashes could spread. Al Qaeda could win a
government minister asked where they would find thepropaganda victory and expand its base of
small army of 20,000 translators? To those who likeoperations..." By this do they mean that Iraq will split into
floating ideas in geo-political bubbles, this annoying littlethree states? If so what are the implications in terms
technical detail brought down the report like a re-run ofof a rethinking of America's military priorities as stated
the Hindenburg disaster. Think it through! The CIA itselfin the objectives of the committee and its report?
can't find a few hundred Arabic speakers forSilence. Nothing to recommend? If the situation is
counter-intelligence in well-paid, cushy surroundings."grave and deteriorating", how will it be after the year it
Where then will the military find 20,000 volunteers,takes to begin putting their proposals into effect? Are
fluent, bi-lingual translators (and, therefore most likely ofwe supposed to imagine that "grave and deteriorating"
Iraqi or other Arab nationality,) who are prepared tois a condition in suspended animation? Couldn't it well
risk their lives on the frontline, as well as risk death andbe that US troops will still be on the ground when the
or torture at the hands of militia death-squads? Withoutgovernment falls and Iraq breaks into 3 states? What
this huge, elite force of "kamikaze linguists", you mightwill they do then? What does the committee suggest
just as well send in another 20,000 Humvees withoutas America's military priorities if this happens in the
steering wheels, or 20,000 fighter planes withoutnext few months?
navigation equipment. It's a non-starter.How should they react? Should they leave Baghdad
Secondly, the Baker report, like Bush, is demanding thatand mixed areas to descend into sectarian genocide?
the Iraqi government to make "substantial progress" inShould they simply accept the Shia state ? Should
reducing sectarianism, achieving reconciliation andthey try to forge alliances with current nationalist
strengthening "security and governance." Otherwise, itinsurgents to fight Al Qaeda in the Sunni state or
threatens to massively reduce US "political, military andsimply give up Al Anbar and re-deploy special forces
economic support." Apart from the obvious Catch 22,to neighbouring states? How will they respond if other
that it will reduce support, while demanding morecountries in the region begin to break apart? This we
efficiency from the Iraqi government and then reducesuppose is beyond the remit of the Iraq Study Group,
forces anyway if the government isn't successful, thewhich only rethinks American military strategy one
idea that the Iraqi government can fulfil this role is justyear in advance according to condition remaining
peddling a lie.exactly in correspondence with their proposals.
The Iraqi government is suspended in mid-air observingOtherwise, some committee will have to deal with it, no
a situation over which it has no control. It is adoubt?
government in name only. Its writ runs no further thanOf course, the Iraq Study Group are well aware that
pieces of paper floating in the wind. Every time thethis is the likely scenario. Their denial of it is not
government attempts to impose a curfew in Baghdad,accidental. In fact, the ramifications are so devastating
it is forced to revoke it, because they have no powerfor the US and the consequences so grave for the
to enforce or sustain it. The militias just continue firingregion and the world, that the Study Group have
mortars across the city and death squads roamedevidently thought it prudent not to present this before
unrestricted carrying out revenge attacks. The policethe American people, at this time. Obviously, it would
and army are powerless to stop them and prefer tomean admitting total and utter defeat. They would
stand aside or participated in the attacks.have to explain how the war on terror and with
At the end of the day, the state boils down to bodiesinvasion of Iraq had resulted not in a model democratic
of armed men willing and able to enforce the will of astate , but the creation of an Al Qaeda state in the
government or other state institution, which commandsheart of the region, strengthening global terrorism and
it. Where this is not the case, as in times of civil warincreasing the threat against the United States itself.
and revolution, the Army itself sometimes becomesThey would have to explain how the world's most
the state. The Iraqi government, however, hasn't anpowerful army crumbled under attack from urban
Army or a police force. Neither force is motivated orinsurgency and sectarian militias. How a Shiite
able to support it and, neither can be depended upontheocratic regime hostile to the US and friendly to Iran
to carry out its will. They are token institutionscame into being and how the hitherto almost unknown
displayed for symbolic international reasons under USconflict between Sunnis and Shias had mushroomed
pressure.into a destabilizing force throughout the region. Finally,
In reality, the Iraqi Army couldn't repulse an attack byhow, not only did Iraq became a battleground for
the Swiss army on bicycles. And the police are littleforeign powers, but how continental-scale civil war and
more than a fresh change of clothes for the militias.regional wars engulfed the whole region, destabilizing oil
Furthermore, to imagine the US forces are standing inmarkets and the global economy, pushing the US and
as substitutes and somehow holding up the Iraqithe world into recession or even a new economic
government, is just gobbledygook. The moment thedepression. Clearly, the Group was unable to deal with
leaders of the main militias decide to withdraw totallythis or felt it better brushed under the carpet for the
from government participation, the government will justtime being. The only thing it can suggest is to call for a
collapse. All the cardboard cut-outs will topple over andregional conference on stability. Set against the
all the stage props will fall down. The Iraqi Army willArmageddon-like scenario, this single, rather limp
disappear along with its weapons and the police willrecommendation sounds like a rather feeble admission
turn their equipment over to the respective militias. Andof impotency.
don't imagine there will be any new elections, becauseNevertheless, despite not entertaining the full
the fact is, NO IRAQI STATE EXISTS to carry themimplications of the catastrophe in Iraq, the report lets
out and no popular demand exists for new ones.seep out some of the very real concerns of the
As for the US Army, they are about as effective asAmerican ruling class for the stability of their system. In
the average UN observer force. Worse still, they have,the words of the report, "our ship of state has hit
in fact, already become a training force, but one forrough waters," "The global standing of the United
the insurgents and militias to hone their military skills forStates could be diminished. Americans could become
use against each other and for the Al Qaeda to itsmore polarized." Behind the scenes even more blunt
groom its forces for future re-deployment around theand hard words are being expressed. There is
region.palpable concern that an unacceptable level of
Whatever pressure Baker or Bush might like todamage is being done to the credibility of the US, its
impose, there simply is no Iraqi government capable ofinstitutions - most notably the Presidency- and the
fulfilling any of its roles, be they one's of economics,standing and morale of its Army. This is not only of
politics or security. And there is no one individual orconcern globally, but also domestically, where the faith
group of individual capable of forming a realof the American people in the whole American system
government. The Baker Commission, and Bushis being put to test.
included, might just as well set benchmarks for theConsequently, the report serves the purpose more of
Icelandic government to disarm the militias, as expecta domestic tactically weapon, than the global, strategic
anything concrete to be carried out by the so-calleddocument it has been blown to be. The purpose of the
government in Baghdad! In reality it is a ghostreport is to corner a President who is not prepared to
government with a phantom army, which has no hopeprivately heed instructions from the shrouded inner
of taking on substance, let alone fulfilling any of thecircles of the American ruling class. Bush is, therefore,
demands made on it by the Baker Report or the Bushbeing given a public, last chance. But so far, and not
administration.totally unexpectedly, his response has served not only
As for calling for discussions with Iran and Syria, this isto divorce him further from the ruling elite, but from the
both an admission by the US that the situation is out ofAmerican people as a whole. Increasingly, he appears
its control and a rather vain and desperate, last ditchdivorced from reality, looking less like a person in denial
attempt to limit the damage to the US and the region.and more like someone in a state of clinical delusion.
But even if certain insurgent and militia groups areBetween the lines of the report, the true message is
aided in by open borders or supplies of equipment andnot whether American forces will be withdrawn by
training, the truth is that the scale and determination of2008, but whether the President will have to be stood
the insurgency is not controlled by, or dependent on,down before that.